The Radical Reading Room

A federal judge extended an order requiring the White House to keep CNN, MS NOW, and Politico reporters credentialed while their lawsuit continues. The ruling calls the ban likely unconstitutional, turning the administration’s “fake news” stunt into a live reminder that viewpoint discrimination is still a problem ev...

A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction on October 13 in the CNN v. Trump case, a sharp sign that the White House’s effort to control press access ran into immediate judicial resistance.

A federal judge extended an order that keeps CNN, MS NOW, and Politico reporters from being pushed out of White House access while their lawsuit plays out. The ruling is another fast, humiliating judicial check on a ban that looked more like punishment for coverage than any real security policy.

A federal judge extended the block on the Trump White House’s attempt to bar CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from White House access, leaving the administration stuck with a loss on access and a fresh reminder that retaliation against the press is still just retaliation.

A federal judge extended an order preventing the administration from excluding reporters from three outlets from White House coverage, keeping a messy press-freedom fight alive while the underlying case moves forward.

A federal judge extended an order blocking the Trump administration from throwing CNN, MS NOW, and Politico out of the White House press pool. The ruling turns what looked like a petty retaliation play into a live First Amendment case with real operational consequences.

CNN, MS NOW, and Politico asked a court to stop the White House from enforcing its access ban while their lawsuit continues.

The administration signaled another round of media restriction even after a federal judge ordered CNN, MS NOW, and Politico’s White House access restored, keeping the First Amendment fight alive instead of cooling it down.

CNN, MS NOW, and Politico sued the Trump administration after being barred from White House grounds, calling the move a content-based punishment and a First Amendment violation.

A federal appeals panel blocked an FCC move that would have let party committees buy broadcast time at candidate rates, preserving existing lowest-unit-charge rules.