News Analysis · October 28, 2026

Waltz and Cuban Foreign Minister Clash at U.N. Assembly

Permanent article number: 102826003   Find another article by number

A reported account of the officials’ shouting exchange, its procedural trigger, and the embargo-resolution context. Confidence 3/5

Original article being examined

Published by: The New Republic

Mike Waltz and Cuban Foreign Minister Get Into Shout-Off at U.N. — Read the exact original

Original reporting and source documents

Open the reporting and original documents used for this article. These include evidence sources; not every link is necessarily the original claim being examined.

Evidence and accountability

Archive transparency: this article has not yet completed the site's newer independent fact-audit process. Its source links are provided below. Do not treat allegations, commentary, or a rating as a legal finding.

Questions sent by Radical Reading Room

These requests have a recorded outbound message ID and send time. A request for comment does not establish that its recipient read the message.

United Nations — Public professional press contact
Question: What was the official ruling or outcome of Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla's procedural objection during the General Assembly session?
Contacted: October 28, 2026 at 7:02 AM (server time).
Status: Response pending; no substantive response recorded.

No verified accountability finding This archive item is sourced reporting, not a finding that a claim is false or misleading.

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz and Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla shouted at each other during a General Assembly session on Tuesday, Oct. 27. The confrontation unfolded as the assembly prepared to vote on an annual resolution condemning the U.S. trade and economic embargo against Cuba. Waltz was addressing the Cuban government when the exchange began.

Members of Cuba’s delegation interrupted Waltz as he criticized the government, and Parrilla moved toward the podium. He challenged the conduct of the session, raising a procedural objection and arguing that the assembly’s rules had been violated. Waltz rejected the interruption and continued addressing the delegates.

The two officials then traded accusations. Parrilla called Waltz a liar, while Waltz told him to move away from the podium and accused him of trying to intimidate him. Waltz also argued that Parrilla objected because he disliked the points being made. Their raised voices drew the attention of the presiding officer, General Assembly President Khalilur Rahman, who attempted to manage the exchange.

The clash took place amid disagreement over the embargo: the resolution before the assembly condemned U.S. policy, while Waltz’s remarks attacked Cuba’s government. The reports establish that the officials argued over both the substance of his speech and Parrilla’s procedural objection. They do not establish that the exchange changed the resolution’s status or the U.S. policy under discussion.

Reporting sources

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Comments

Read the discussion freely. Posting and voting require a verified member account. Every comment and reply is screened by AI before publication. Clear spam and abuse are blocked; only strongly cleared comments publish automatically, while uncertain drafts wait for moderator review. Civil factual disagreement alone is not grounds for rejection.

Log in to comment or join free to take part.


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.