Federal Judge Rejects Request to Segregate California Ballots
Permanent article number: 102826042 Find another article by number
Original article being examined
Published by: wtop.com
Original reporting and source documents
Open the reporting and original documents used for this article. These include evidence sources; not every link is necessarily the original claim being examined.
Evidence and accountability
Archive transparency: this article has not yet completed the site's newer independent fact-audit process. Its source links are provided below. Do not treat allegations, commentary, or a rating as a legal finding.
Questions sent by Radical Reading Room
These requests have a recorded outbound message ID and send time. A request for comment does not establish that its recipient read the message.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) — Public professional press contact
Question: What is the immigration status of the approximately 20,000 individuals flagged as likely noncitizens on California's voter rolls?
Contacted: October 29, 2026 at 2:53 AM (server time).
Status: Response pending; no substantive response recorded.
A federal judge on Wednesday, Oct. 28, rejected the Trump administration’s request to stop California from processing ballots from as many as 20,000 people whom the federal government alleged were likely noncitizens. U.S. District Judge David O. Carter warned that segregating ballots during the ongoing election could disrupt voting. More than 3.7 million people had already voted in the state, according to the reports.
The administration had asked Carter to require California to wait before counting the ballots until the voters’ immigration status could be verified. The request followed a federal lawsuit filed in mid-October accusing state election officials of failing to meet a 48-hour deadline to review a list of 20,000 people the administration alleged were likely noncitizens on the voter rolls.
Carter said separating ballots at this stage would require counties to develop new sorting methods and risk disenfranchising voters. He reasoned that the request would have an effect similar to purging voters and would violate the National Voting Rights Act’s prohibition on changes to voter rolls within 90 days of an election. The ruling rejected the government’s demand; it did not determine whether the people named in its allegations were citizens.
The Justice Department said it would immediately appeal. The administration’s stated aim was to hold the ballots until immigration status could be checked, while Carter concluded that segregation itself could harm voters and disrupt an election already underway. The appeal was announced, but the supplied reports do not establish that it had been decided.
Comments
Read the discussion freely. Posting and voting require a verified member account. Every comment and reply is screened by AI before publication. Clear spam and abuse are blocked; only strongly cleared comments publish automatically, while uncertain drafts wait for moderator review. Civil factual disagreement alone is not grounds for rejection.
Log in to comment or join free to take part.
No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.