Report Alleges Effort to Recruit Second Dan Sullivan in Alaska Senate Race
Permanent article number: 102826035 Find another article by number
Original article being examined
Published by: The Jerusalem Post
Original reporting and source documents
Open the reporting and original documents used for this article. These include evidence sources; not every link is necessarily the original claim being examined.
Evidence and accountability
Archive transparency: this article has not yet completed the site's newer independent fact-audit process. Its source links are provided below. Do not treat allegations, commentary, or a rating as a legal finding.
A New York Times investigation published Wednesday alleged that people connected to Mary Peltola’s campaign helped recruit Daniel J. Sullivan, a candidate sharing the name of Republican Sen. Dan S. Sullivan, for Alaska’s Senate race. The report described the effort as an attempt to draw votes from the incumbent. Peltola’s campaign has denied involvement in the namesake candidate’s run; Daniel J. Sullivan has also denied an association with the campaign.
The reporting traced the effort to 2025, when Peltola allies began looking for Alaskans named Dan Sullivan who might run for Senate. It described Democratic operative Jerid Kurtz meeting potential candidates. The investigation said he found Daniel J. Sullivan, a retired teacher in Petersburg, who entered the race. The account is an allegation about recruitment, not a finding by a court or election authority.
Elisa Rios, Peltola’s former campaign manager, provided an account to the Times after she was fired in August, according to the reports. She said Peltola knew about the effort, then later tried to withdraw her statements. The Times said its reporting also drew on text exchanges and other evidence, including messages that stretched across several months.
The campaign’s denial and Rios’s attempt to retract her remarks leave competing accounts in the record. The coverage does not establish that voters were confused or that the alleged recruitment changed the race’s outcome. It documents a reported effort to recruit candidates and the evidence the newspaper cited for that account, while those implicated have denied involvement or disputed parts of it.
Comments
Read the discussion freely. Posting and voting require a verified member account. Every comment and reply is screened by AI before publication. Clear spam and abuse are blocked; only strongly cleared comments publish automatically, while uncertain drafts wait for moderator review. Civil factual disagreement alone is not grounds for rejection.
Log in to comment or join free to take part.
No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.