DHS Requests Removal of ICE Employee Data Site
Permanent article number: 102926071 Find another article by number
Original article being examined
Published by: Al Jazeera
Original reporting and source documents
Open the reporting and original documents used for this article. These include evidence sources; not every link is necessarily the original claim being examined.
Evidence and accountability
Archive transparency: this article has not yet completed the site's newer independent fact-audit process. Its source links are provided below. Do not treat allegations, commentary, or a rating as a legal finding.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has asked an Icelandic web hosting company to remove a website containing data on thousands of its employees, including those from Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The company, FlokiNET, received a letter from cybersecurity firm ZeroFox on behalf of DHS, accusing it of violating terms of service by publishing a dataset labeled 'stolen.' The letter warned that the content exposes over 40,000 individuals to risks of harassment and physical harm.
FlokiNET declined to comply and stated that the public has a legitimate interest in knowing who carries out enforcement work and under what authority. The data was first shared by the activist group Distributed Denial of Secrets, which has previously released information from convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and Israeli authorities.
A hacker group called the Department of Peace claimed responsibility for obtaining the data through a sign-in service used in internal systems.
The Trump administration has taken a firm stance against platforms hosting data about ICE personnel, as seen in prior actions involving tech companies.
Comments
Read the discussion freely. Posting and voting require a verified member account. Every comment and reply is screened by AI before publication. Clear spam and abuse are blocked; only strongly cleared comments publish automatically, while uncertain drafts wait for moderator review. Civil factual disagreement alone is not grounds for rejection.
Log in to comment or join free to take part.
No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.