News Analysis · October 29, 2026

Manosphere Called Public Health Crisis by Academics

Permanent article number: 102926054   Find another article by number

Evidence-based news report Confidence 3/5

Original article being examined

Published by: The Independent — News

Manosphere must be treated as a public health problem like smoking, academics warn — Read the exact original

Original reporting and source documents

Open the reporting and original documents used for this article. These include evidence sources; not every link is necessarily the original claim being examined.

Evidence and accountability

Archive transparency: this article has not yet completed the site's newer independent fact-audit process. Its source links are provided below. Do not treat allegations, commentary, or a rating as a legal finding.

No verified accountability finding This archive item is sourced reporting, not a finding that a claim is false or misleading.
Correction: October 29, 2026: Removed an unrelated, unsupported statement that named people were currently detained in the United States and facing extradition; the cited academic reporting did not establish that asserted custodial status. Central reporting on the Lancet commentary remains.

Corrections and clarifications

October 30, 2026: October 29, 2026: Removed an unrelated, unsupported statement that named people were currently detained in the United States and facing extradition; the cited academic reporting did not establish that asserted custodial status. Central reporting on the Lancet commentary remains.

Academics have urged the manosphere—online communities promoting anti-feminist views and aggressive masculinity—to be treated as a public health issue, akin to smoking or obesity. The report, published in The Lancet, defines the manosphere as a 'diffuse commercial ecosystem' united by beliefs in misogyny and male victimisation. It argues that such content normalises health-harming masculinities and fuels mental health issues and violence against women. The authors note that outrage and grievance are 'good for business,' with content creators and platforms incentivising extreme expressions of masculinity.

Co-authors Professor Sarah Hawkes and Professor Kent Buse stress that boys’ insecurities are exploited and monetised. They argue that solutions must offer boys meaningful alternatives, not just discourage the manosphere. Buse describes the manosphere as a 'business model,' not a fringe, with content designed to profit from outrage.

The report draws parallels to the tobacco industry, where blame was shifted to individuals rather than structural factors. Experts call for coordinated action across governments, schools, and health services to address the issue.

Reporting sources

Sources used for this report

These are the source links stored with this report when it was published. Open them directly to inspect the underlying reporting or primary document.

Comments

Read the discussion freely. Posting and voting require a verified member account. Every comment and reply is screened by AI before publication. Clear spam and abuse are blocked; only strongly cleared comments publish automatically, while uncertain drafts wait for moderator review. Civil factual disagreement alone is not grounds for rejection.

Log in to comment or join free to take part.


No comments yet. Be the first reasonably on-topic person here.